Thursday, May 10

Executive Order: Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens

Share our page and this post with a Facebook Like!

Join our Facebook page by recommending us here!

Help spread the 1461 by Tweeting to your followers!

See the Official Release from the White house below.

A PDF of the signed Executive Order document will be available as soon as it is published in the National Archives.

Follow the link to view the full list of President Obama's Executive Orders.

Learn more about other Presidents and how they have used the Power of the Executive Order by clicking here.

Executive Order - Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens
For Immediate Release: May 10, 2012

- - - - - - -

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to modernize our regulatory system and to reduce unjustified regulatory burdens and costs, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. Regulations play an indispensable role in protecting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment, but they can also impose significant burdens and costs. During challenging economic times, we should be especially careful not to impose unjustified regulatory requirements. For this reason, it is particularly important for agencies to conduct retrospective analyses of existing rules to examine whether they remain justified and whether they should be modified or streamlined in light of changed circumstances, including the rise of new technologies.

Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system "must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements." To promote this goal, that Executive Order requires agencies not merely to conduct a single exercise, but to engage in "periodic review of existing significant regulations." Pursuant to section 6(b) of that Executive Order, agencies are required to develop retrospective review plans to review existing significant regulations in order to "determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed." The purpose of this requirement is to "make the agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives."

In response to Executive Order 13563, agencies have developed and made available for public comment retrospective review plans that identify over five hundred initiatives. A small fraction of those initiatives, already finalized or formally proposed to the public, are anticipated to eliminate billions of dollars in regulatory costs and tens of millions of hours in annual paperwork burdens. Significantly larger savings are anticipated as the plans are implemented and as action is taken on additional initiatives.

As a matter of longstanding practice and to satisfy statutory obligations, many agencies engaged in periodic review of existing regulations prior to the issuance of Executive Order 13563. But further steps should be taken, consistent with law, agency resources, and regulatory priorities, to promote public participation in retrospective review, to modernize our regulatory system, and to institutionalize regular assessment of significant regulations.

Sec. 2. Public Participation in Retrospective Review. Members of the public, including those directly and indirectly affected by regulations, as well as State, local, and tribal governments, have important information about the actual effects of existing regulations. For this reason, and consistent with Executive Order 13563, agencies shall invite, on a regular basis (to be determined by the agency head in consultation with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)), public suggestions about regulations in need of retrospective review and about appropriate modifications to such regulations. To promote an open exchange of information, retrospective analyses of regulations, including supporting data, shall be released to the public online wherever practicable.

Sec. 3. Setting Priorities. In implementing and improving their retrospective review plans, and in considering retrospective review suggestions from the public, agencies shall give priority, consistent with law, to those initiatives that will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork burdens while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment. To the extent practicable and permitted by law, agencies shall also give special consideration to initiatives that would reduce unjustified regulatory burdens or simplify or harmonize regulatory requirements imposed on small businesses. Consistent with Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), agencies shall give consideration to the cumulative effects of their own regulations, including cumulative burdens, and shall to the extent practicable and consistent with law give priority to reforms that would make significant progress in reducing those burdens while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment.

Sec. 4. Accountability. Agencies shall regularly report on the status of their retrospective review efforts to OIRA. Agency reports should describe progress, anticipated accomplishments, and proposed timelines for relevant actions, with an emphasis on the priorities described in section 3 of this order. Agencies shall submit draft reports to OIRA on September 10, 2012, and on the second Monday of January and July for each year thereafter, unless directed otherwise through subsequent guidance from OIRA. Agencies shall make final reports available to the public within a reasonable period (not to exceed three weeks from the date of submission of draft reports to OIRA).

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) For purposes of this order, "agency" means any authority of the United States that is an "agency" under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).

(b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(c) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


1461 would like to thank our current sponser - Cricket Wireless
Smartphone plans - $55/month

Join the conversation and post your thoughts in the comments!
Read the 1461 Comment Guidelines.

1461 is currently being read by over 225,000 and spreading! Help the 1461 spread - invite your friends and family to join the 1461 and learn the truth rather than BS!


  1. Anonymous7:20 AM EDT


    1. Anonymous3:49 AM EDT

      Did you actually read this? Or are you just here to be a dummy? The purpose here is to simplify existing and remove unnecessary regulation. Such as that rule that no longer applies at work because the machine it applies to was removed seven years ago but is still enforced is actually now costing the company money. Yeah, that's what this does, it removes that rule so the company (the country) can SAVE money and crawl out of the sinkhole of debt caused by overregulation.

  2. Anonymous4:02 PM EDT

    Sounds like a great idea but the review should be expanded to include laws that were made for good reason, still have good reason to exist, yet have fallen to the wayside or have been blatantly thrown out by an anti-constitutional president or congress.
    IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR INSTANCE, or the law that says the president must be born in the USA, or that the president, congress, military, police force, should do every thing possible to protect and uphold the constitution. WHY IS NOTHING BEING DONE TO STOP THE BLATANTLY TREASONOUS ACTIONS BEING TAKEN IN OUR COUNTRY? WE NEED TO START AT THE TOP AND WORK OUR WAY DOWN. IT'S TIME TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH!


  3. Anonymous7:21 PM EDT

    On the contrary, laws that are very important and that have not been enforced should be looked at and brought back to everyone's attention. This is of significantly more importance than getting rid of laws that no longer apply. Such as the treason laws, or even the laws about the eligibility of a presidential candidate, or giving false testimony in a court of law, or to congress. Obviously, they have fallen to the wayside and forgotten.


Welcome to the 1461. Join the conversation.
If this is your first visit - read the Comment Guidelines

Remember you have a Constitutionally protected right to anonymous political free speech, not a free pass to be an ass.